They're reporting that she dropped over $5,000 on 31 dresses and even give a minute-by-minute breakdown: "Paris Hilton spends $140 a minute in Chapel Street, Melbourne, shopping spree" is one headline.

One of their charity chiefs is disgusted. "In World Vision terms, $5000 would ensure that a village of 2000 people in Africa or Asia would have clean water for the rest of their lives," says World Vision of Australia head Tim Costello.

The paper also believes that Paris Hilton's shopping spree is a "stunt designed to promote herself."

Why did these reporters focus on one of Paris Hilton's shopping trips without mentioning her monster feet, beak nose, diseases, sex tape, attempt at a singing career, faux baby voice, boyfriend choices, flat ass, hipless boy body and wonk eye? Sounds like they need to be schooled on being objective journalists. FAIL!

source