Rihanna's Nude Photos Cost Her Vogue Magazine Cover
Anna Wintour was going to put Rihanna on the cover of Vogue magazine, but after RiRi's naked pictures leaked onto the internet, things changed.
Star magazine reports, Rihanna and Vogue editor-in-chief Anna Wintour had been talking for weeks about doing the cover and an inside spread, says a close friend of the singer, who adds that the two even chatted about it at the Met Costume Institute Gala on May 4.
"Anna told her Vogue absolutely loves her and really wanted to work with her. Rihanna was ecstatic!” But since the photos came out, says the friend, “Anna hasn’t returned any of her calls. Rihanna’s so upset!”
Vogue needs to get over itself and start being more diverse with its cover choices. I don't really care if RiRi's on the cover and honestly don't feel like she deserves it cause she's a sh*tty role model; but Vogue should step its game up and get with the times by starting to feature public figures of color on a more than once-every-few-years-basis.
Related Posts
- Rihanna Performs "Where Have You Been" on American Idol
- Russell Simmons Defends Rihanna For Sleeping Around
- Rihanna Naked Pictures From "Where Have You Been"
- Rihanna Unfollows Chris Brown on Twitter After He Disses Her In Song
Twitter
May 30th, 2009 1:34 AM
I totally agree with you about this. I think Vogue has started trying to do a little bit more of that, slowly but surely. I noticed they recently has Michelle Obama on their cover and then Beyonce shortly after that.Rihanna would have made a great cover girl, but there is too much going on with her right now.
May 29th, 2009 5:50 PM
Those were Vogue's reasons: Rihanna's nude pics?! How lame! It's not like Rihanna pulled a Phil Spector or anything..
May 29th, 2009 5:39 PM
They like their borderline racist token covers, sucks for RiRi, could have been an easy pay day.