Here's the PETA ad starring Pamela Anderson that was supposed to begin playing in select airports.
Pammy Pammy cupcakes isn't happy the ad is being pulled.
"I don’t think it’s that provocative, they showed a couple of bare butts. I am shocked, I thought we were a little more evolved."
It does look like she's ready to blow the dude in the beginning of the ad, but other than that, it's completely stupid. I would ban it just for being so dumb and pointless. PETA, you can get more creative than this, and get a new spokesperson cause Pam is becoming an old hag.
Share
4 Comments
Twitter
September 11th, 2009 4:47 PM
WTF. With the exception of the "no fur," "no animal skins" and "no leather" signage, is any message being conveyed on PETA's part in this public-service announcement at all? It looks more like a soft porn film being shot in the San Fernando Valley than anything else!
Provocative, yes. Message conveyed effectively, N-O.
The provocativeness trumps anything else in the PSA, in my opinion. Don't get me wrong, I think PETA meant well in the video. But this is yet another example of PETA trying excruciatingly hard in an effort to win over people with its arguably questionable tactics and I think this PSA falls flat in that category of that repeated trend.
September 11th, 2009 4:50 PM
I hit the "submit" button too prematurely. Having said that, I can't understand why the PSA was banned in certain places, but by and large, we're too conservative in this country (unlike Europe) to have the balls to tolerate something like it.
September 11th, 2009 4:51 PM
*can understand*
November 15th, 2009 8:30 PM
By doing stupid ads for PETA ol PAMELA ANDERSON proves about the dumb blond types