Tag Archives: 2 Cents

2013 MTV Movie Awards: Five Reasons We’re Tuning In!

by on

Are you excited for tonight’s MTV Movie Awards?! Here’s the top five reasons we are: 5) Emma Watson will be awarded the MTV Trailblazer Award. Has anyone seen her UK GQ photoshoot? Hot damn!

Emma Watson sexy legs

4) According to MTV, there will be a three-way “catfish” during the pre-show with Anna Kendrick, Mark Wahlberg and Joe Manganiello. We have no idea what to expect, but um, yes please.

3) The Movie of the Year category pits The Dark Knight Rises against Silver Linings Playbook — two dramatically different, but equally-bomb @ss flicks. (Other nominees include Django Unchained, Marvel’s The Avengers, and Ted.)

2) A very-pregnant Kim Kardashian is introducing a performance by Selena Gomez. Will she appear as big as some say she is?

1) Rebel Wilson, the Internet’s most GIF-able personality, is hosting the show. Be prepared for a grotesque, Australian-accented night of hilarity!

Tune in to the MTV Movie Awards tonight at 9/8C!

Tags: , ,

Celebrities at Coachella – What They Should Be Doing Instead

by on

What could possibly pull A-Listers away from their kidney-shaped pools and bottles of sparkling water and into the realm of port-o-potties and face paint? Why, Coachella Music Festival, of course!

coachella-2013

In its 14th year, the Indio, CA music fest is boasting another fabulous roster with (some of) our fave celebs in attendance. But while we love Tinseltown folk and think they deserve a weekend rockin’ out like the rest of us, we love calling them out even more. Here are some of Coachella’s big-name attendees, and where they should be this weekend (instead of parading around in the desert):

Alicia Silverstone: somewhere less obvious for a vegan, PETA-loving Hollywood actress. A NASCAR race, maybe?

Danny DeVito: in a studio creating more It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia seasons. Not being the creepy, 68-year-old man at a music festival for USC hipsters.

Lindsay Lohan: literally anywhere else in the world without weed, booze, and prying photogs every ten feet. I mean, c’mon. Anywhere.

Rihanna: sipping martinis with Katy Perry and sending that super-overdue break-up text to Chris crazy-@ss Brown.

Paris Hilton: …Who? Oh, that irrelevant, 2003 Caucasian version of Kim Kardashian? Girl, just find a hubby and settle down already. Nobody cares you’re at the party, and we definitely don’t believe you’re there for the music.

Katy Perry: persuading gal-pal RiRi to send that text already, and re-thinking her decision to show boobies at a kids award show.

Ke$ha: of all places, Coachella would be the perfect place to drink your own urine!

Camera Diaz: in a salon, getting her hair dyed back to blond. Like, ASAP. Like, you’re not a brunette. Like, it’s still not back to blond yet?!

Florence Welsh: …actually, it makes perfect sense that Britain’s best lady rocker would be there. Have fun, girl!

Tags: ,

Jennifer Lawrence: Top 10 Reasons She’s Unstoppable

by on

She’s young, she’s talented, she’s gorgeous and remains down to earth. If you aren’t a Jennifer Lawrence fan, this isn’t the post for you. We think she’s great and here’s our Top 10 list of reasons why the young Oscar winner has gained so many fans in the past few years. Hint: She deserves it.

Jennifer Lawrence cheekbones

10) She wears mysterious, magical dresses.

9) She digs Harry Potter. “I saw Daniel Radcliffe when I was doing David Letterman and I flipped out,” she told Vanity Fair. “I was screaming.”

8) She creepily stares at Meryl Streep.

7) She embraces her inner Kentucky. “Little redneck things still come out,” she told Rolling Stone. “I’m attracted to my brother. Things like that.”

6) She still keeps in touch with her No. 1 fan back in Louisville.

5) She smokes pot.

4) She doesn’t have washboard abs, and is totally OK with it. “I hate saying, ‘I like exercising,’” she told Glamour last April. “I want to punch people who say that in the face.”

3) She beats imaginary drums while doing live interviews.

2) She gets star struck/super creeped out by Jack Nicholson, like the rest of us.

1) She’s played a mutant who can morph into different people, the girl who saved District 12 with a bow and arrow, just won a Golden Globe and an Oscar, and isn’t even 23.

Tags: ,

HBO’s Girls: Hannah Has Sex With a 42 Year-Old Stranger, Doesn’t Mention Birth Control or STDs

by on

Girls picked up a Golden Globe award and Lena Dunham won a Best Actress Golden Globe for portraying Hannah on HBO's Girls. The first season of the hit series was groundbreaking and realistic. Hannah struggles to make it in New York and her friends are all going through relatable struggles. Then season 2 happened.

Hannah-on-girls

On last Sunday's episode of Girls, Hannah walks to a strange man's house, asks to come inside, kisses him and then f**ks him on his countertop. He tells her that she can spend the night, which she does. We soon see Hannah playing ping pong while topless only to have sex on the ping pong table with the same 42 year-old man. Then she takes a shower and passes out while nude.

Girls-patrick-wilson

Hannah then cries to the 42 year-old about how she wants to be happy. She's a screw loose and her new sex buddy discovers that. While it may be likely that a 42 year-old man wouldn't hesitate to have sex with a desperate 24 year-old, no matter how unattractive she is, why is Girls void of discussing sexually transmitted diseases, unplanned pregnancies, or I don't know, rape and murder?!

It's unsafe to go to a strange man's house to have sex with him, irregardless of how long you've known him. It's even more dangerous to do so with someone you've known for a few minutes.

As a female you're forced to always put your safety first so that you don't become a statistic. You encounter close calls. It's hard enough not to be raped or murdered, or almost raped and murdered, on your dates. It's offensive that this series refuses to address this.

In real life, Lena says that doesn't like that Rihanna is back with Chris Brown because Rihanna has young female fans; but Lena's promiscuous character is far from being a positive role model for the young girls she claims to be vested in protecting. Dunham should be honest about the mistakes that the characters in Girls continuously make. Watching an unattractive young woman have sex with an attractive older man is entertaining, sure, but ignoring the importance of using condoms and birth control is irresponsible.

Tags: , ,

Roberto Martinez: The New ‘Bachelor’ Because of ABC’s Discrimination Lawsuit?!?!

by on

ABC has only had Caucasian Bachelors and Bachelorettes and then the network was hit with a discrimination lawsuit after two African-American men say they weren’t considered viable candidates during the audition process. So what’s a thriving network and a successful franchise to do? Bring in the Latino so that you can say you aren’t racist. This is exactly the same as the bigots who “aren’t racist” because they have “a black friend!”

Roberto Martinez The Bachelor

Life & Style magazine is reporting that Roberto Martinez, Ali Fedotowsky‘s ex-fiance from The Bachelorette season 6 will be the Season 17 Bachelor!

An insider confessed: “He’s already signed the contract. They chose him because he’s very likable.”

Roberto was not chosen because he’s “very likable,” he was chosen because he isn’t white! It’s that simple! And he isn’t black, which is even better! ABC execs didn’t have to sh!t their pants by going as far as casting an African-American and now they’re going to try to prove that they weren’t discriminating when the timing of this is so blatantly obvious!

Bachelor and Bachelorette stars are typically chosen because they’re runners-up from the preceding season, not from years ago, e.g., Ben Flajnik was plucked from Ashley Hebert’s season. This is pathetic.

DO YOU THINK ROBERTO WOULD MAKE A GOOD BACHELOR?

Tags: ,

Snooki’s Pregnancy: What It Means For Her Career and The Future of “Jersey Shore”

by on

Everyone from Sammi Sweetheart to Rihanna has spoken out in favor of Nicole Snooki Polizzi's surprise pregnancy, but what does the impending bundle of "guido" joy actually mean for Snooks' castmates and the show that made her famous?

Snooki Pregnant Us Weekly Cover

Season five of Jersey Shore concluded last night with several bangs and a whimper. It was a suitably anti-climactic send-off for the show's most drama-free season yet. Shore remains strong in the ratings, but fan enthusiasm has waned as we've watched our beloved pack of super-tan hook-up fiends morph into a group of bored millionaires who play increasingly pointless pranks on one another. This is the first time a season of Shore has concluded without a new season already in the works. But that's fine because 3 of the 8 cast members have spin-offs on the way, right?

Not necessarily. The most high-profile of these spin-offs focuses solely on Snooki and her BFF JWoww. It was originally intended to showcase their odd couple dynamic with Jenni playing concerned mom to Nicole's carefree party monster. But now that Snooki is soon to be an actual mom, will the show be able give fans what they came for? And if the spin-off tanks, does that prove once and for all that both Snooki and JWoww are incapable of maintaining fame post-Shore?

Snooki and JWoww: Spinoff Photo

MTV will cash in on the strange popularity of this Garden State subculture at least once more before pulling the plug. We'll see a final season of Shore in which a pregnant Snooki makes sporadic, (hopefully) sober cameos. But let's face it – after the final "farewell season" the show will lose its main attraction. There's nothing to say Snooki can't work after she has a child, but she can't do the kind of work that made her famous. Seeing a young, single woman get drunk and sleep with a succession of "gorillas" is fun; seeing a young mother behave in such a fashion is, well…Teen Mom. So while the Snookster may be overjoyed with the thought of starting a family and we wish her all the best…her pregnancy sadly signals the end of the Age of the Guido. What a time we had.

(Photos: WENN, Fame/Flynet)

Tags: , ,

Oscar Nominations 2012: Why Does The Academy Hate Moviegoers?

by on

The 2012 Academy Award nominations were announced on Tuesday, and if you found the news was not exactly a hot topic of conversation around the office that morning, you’re not alone. The average American, even the average movie lover doesn’t care about the Oscars for the simple reason that the Academy has conditioned them not to care. Year after year, the Hollywood elite demonstrate the massiveness of the divide between the film industry and the moviegoing public by nominating not the most beloved, acclaimed, or even most deserving films, but rather, the films that mean the most to insiders and that benefited from the best award season PR campaigns.

Brad Pitt - Moneyball Poster

That’s not to say there aren’t some wonderful films nominated this year, and every year. There certainly are. Moneyball, War Horse, and The Help were popular with critics and audiences alike, and it’s refreshing to see the usually stagnant movie industry honor a fresh, innovative film like The Artist. But this year, perhaps more than any other, offered Academy members a chance to show that they share some tastes in common with the average theater patron, and they firmly passed it up.

There was talk of Best Picture nominations for audience favorites such as Bridesmaids, Drive, or even Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part II – films that connected with audiences as much as with critics. Naturally, all three were passed up, for reasons that remain baffling to the general public, but probably have to do with the funny, or violent, or thoroughly modern nature of those films. The Academy hopes to attract the interests of a younger audience, while at the same time honoring only films that you could safely enjoy with your Great Aunt Mildred.

Bridesmaids Poster

Playing it safe has damaged the reputation of the Awards in the past (by honoring forgettable, family friendlier fare such as Ordinary People or Dances With Wolves instead of riskier modern classics such as Raging Bull or Goodfellas) but at this point, staying on the beaten path may mean sacrificing all the esteem and credibility that the Oscars have built up over generations. Of course, it could be argued that movies are a matter of taste and all taste is subjective (I don’t believe that, but we’ll go with it). Maybe the Academy members aren’t consciously picking safe-bet, cookie-cutter prestige pictures that are traditionally ignored by audiences; maybe these are just the movies they like! If that’s the case, explain Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close….

 

As a whole, the critical community lambasted this sentimental, manipulative piece of post-9/11 claptrap. It currently enjoys a 47% rating on the review collection site Rotten Tomatoes, making it the lowest-rated film to ever get nominated for Best Picture. Surely all 6,000 members of the Academy couldn’t have disagreed so unanimously with the nation’s critics, right? So, why did the universally reviled Extremely Loud make waves with ASCAP while leaving critics so cold? Simple – Academy members didn’t enjoy the film anymore than critics, audiences (who ignored it), or anyone else. They just decided that the super serious subject matter made it Grade-A Oscar material. They don’t care about honoring great movies, just Important Movies. That’s why the public has stopped caring. Your average film lover doesn’t think like the Academy – he doesn’t care how future generations will feel about his taste in movies.

It’s tempting to think that the Academy just doesn’t care about your opinion or mine, but they do. They care deeply. Without us, there’s no reason for them to exist. But we should send the message that instead of trying to lure us in with “hip young” hosts, and elaborate musical numbers the simplest way to get us to watch their annual ceremony would be to nominate films and actors that the public actually cares about. I’d like to say I’ll mount a one-man boycott, but I know I’ll be in front of my TV on February 26, along with millions of other Americans who don’t care who wins.

Tags:

Zooey Deschanel: New Girl’s “Jess” Character is Too Annoying for Viewers

by on

Every season we’re all drawn into at least one new show, and every season one of the shows that we love turns to sh!t. Fox’s hit show New Girl had a very strong start. The premiere episode itself was like a mini-movie that didn’t even need a second episode. Still, the show continued to look promising, but Zooey Deschanel‘s schtick is now getting old.

New Girl, Zooey Deschanel as Jess

A writer named Nathalie Atkinson argues that New Girl‘s Jess is mad annoying and the show’s December ratings hit an all-time low. Ironically Zooey has been nominated for a Golden Globe, a nomination I believe she deserved.

Nathalie says: “Deschanel’s Jess floats through life in vintage floral dresses; she’s not just spacey but dumb as a puppy. She’s erratic to the point of manic… Jess gets to makes scrunched-up faces, and occasionally bursts into song at inappropriate times.”

She continued by saying that “being the lady-child with no guile is worse than being the dumb blonde.”

Jess is supposed to be “adorkable,” but the writers take it too far. Jess was in a relationship for six years and claims that she doesn’t know how to have sex, can’t say the word “penis,” and put a turkey in a dryer to cook for Thanksgiving!!!! Yep, the fun, once-believable new series has become that bad. I still love New Girl, though. There’s something very fresh and fun about it. I highly recommend it, even if Jess is an annoying idiot.

Zooey Deschanel pictureZooey Deschanel photoZooey Deschanel imageZooey Deschanel dressZooey Deschanel curly hairZooey Deschanel sexyZooey Deschanel legsZooey Deschanel bangsZooey Deschanel booty photoZooey Deschanel hipsterZooey Deschanel on ExtraZooey Deschanel picZooey Deschanel, Ben Gibbard splitZooey Deschanel big hair

Tags: , ,

Lindsay Lohan In Playboy: What It Means For Her Career and Our Culture

by on

Unless you’ve been living in the kind of isolated, hyper-delusional state common to drugged-out, washed-up Hollywood starlets, you’re aware, by now, that Lindsay Lohan recently posed nude for Playboy. You may also be aware that the highly-anticipated photo spread has been leaked online and that the reaction to the sight of Lindsay in her freckled birthday suit has been, well…mixed.

Lindsay Lohan Playboy

Regardless of your feelings about Lindsay and the choices that she’s made with her career and personal life, you’d be a fool to deny that she looks stunning in the photos. But of course she does. Given the team of make-up artists, photographers, and air-brushers at her disposal, anyone could appear nearly flawless. But nearly flawless wasn’t enough for LiLo. These pictures were supposed to signal the rebirth of her career. They earned her some of her first positive press since The Parent Trap. This spread was supposed to blow our hair back and remind us why Lindsay used to be a star. Instead, we got a derivative spread featuring an attractive naked girl who looked about as natural as you’d expect from a redhead pretending to be Marilyn Monroe.

Lindsay Lohan Playboy Photo

Lindsay’s been judged harshly, but she deserves to be. This wasn’t a leaked sex tape or a hacked cell phone photo. This was a ploy for money and a career comeback by a young woman who’s  done nothing to debunk rumors that she’s anything but a self-obsessed egomaniac. Her notoriety is the result of the same “fame is the new talent” dynamic that gave us the Kardashian franchise, but Lindsay’s popularity is even more ill-gained. The fact that she received a million dollar paycheck for a few hours of nudity speaks volumes about the assets that the entertainment industry considers valuable. But the fact that the Internet spoiled Playboy‘s big payday indicates that the old, cheap tricks aren’t working anymore.

The Kardashian empire is crumbling and the Lohan Playboy sales bonanza turned out to be a bust. The two downfalls may seem unrelated, but they’re not. In the modern age, intelligent, disgruntled fans can convene on the Internet and lay waste to the delicate PR shields that talentless mega-stars hide behind. We saw through Kim’s marriage scam for the same reason we’re unimpressed by Lindsay’s photoshopped hotness: even if we’re not in the know, we have a direct connection to people who are. So since the web burst her naked bubble, will LiLo enjoy any career boost from showing off the goods?

 

No. But not because of the leak. A smarter star could have turned the premature release of the photos into a “Whoops, I’m just like y’all” moment. Instead, Linds remained characteristically skittish about interviews, but remained in the public eye as a result of the moronic scandals that she’s best known for. Lindsay’s career won’t benefit from her Playboy spread simply because the public is fed up with her and we see right through her desperate last-ditch effort to remain famous.

Kim Kardashian‘s sex tape may have helped her become famous, but LiLo’s latest attempt at gaining the public’s adoration is even more pathetic. For one, she was already famous. She gained fame legitimately, as a result of her talent, but squandered it through years of misbehavior. Two, even if Kim masterminded the release of her own sex tape, she didn’t directly receive a paycheck from it the way Lindsay did. The well-known million dollar price tag on her photos may be a point of pride for Lindsay, but it smacks of desperation to everyone else. Nudity has been the last resort for many a failed actress in the twilight of her career.

So this could be the last gasp of the tabloid queen America loves to hate. Lindsay could still resurrect her acting career, but it seems unlikely she’d be willing to put in the work and pay her dues with small indie roles the way she would need to. But what’s bad for Lindsay is good for our culture. Turning our attention away from her sends a message that we’ll indulge spoiled, entitled starlets for only so long before we grow tired of their antics. By putting the final nail in her career’s coffin we’re saying that a lasting place in the spotlight must be earned through talent and hard work. If I were Kim Kardashian, I’d be very nervous.

Tags: ,

Jerry Sandusky: What We Should Learn From the Penn State Scandal

by on

Through the Penn State sex abuse scandal, we have been given the opportunity to put a face to a vicious, widespread crime. That face, at the moment, is that of Jerry Sandusky.

Sandusky, 67, has been charged with sexual abuse of eight boys over a 15-year period. His preliminary hearing on 40 criminal counts is scheduled for Dec. 13. A new accuser came forward just days ago.

As parents across the country sit on their couches and call Jerry a sick a-hole, their relatives, friends, neighbors, church members, babysitters, boyfriends, husbands, children’s teachers, parents of their children’s friends, and others are currently sexually abusing their kids.

Jerry Sandusky teeth

Jerry’s case has put a spotlight on athletic coaches. Sadly, other abuse allegations involving coaches have surfaced within the past few weeks, but figuring out who may abuse your child isn’t that simple. There is no definitive profile of a child molester. 

How many times have we heard parents say that they told their child to tell them if someone touches them? How many times have we, as grown adults, done something that truly terrifies us? How many times have we confessed to participating in something that we are deeply ashamed of and feel responsible for? Every parent assumes that their child will tell them if they have been abused, and nearly every parent is wrong. Case in point: Decades and alleged victims later we are finally hearing that Sandusky was allegedly having his way with young, disadvantaged boys. Decades later some alleged victims are now coming forward.

It’s comforting to sit at home, look at Sandusky‘s rotting teeth, unattractive face, and say that he is sick. Inside we’re all thinking that he looks like a child molester, walks like a child molester, and says things that a child molester would. We breathe a collective sigh; our children are still safe, or are they?

As someone whose former babysitter’s son is currently sitting in a jail cell convicted of rape, and has victimized some people that I know, as a friend to those who’ve been abused by relatives, family friends, and others they were close to (and from the countless stories we’ve all heard), it becomes clear that predators are, essentially, our “friends.” The people we “know and trust” are the ones who abuse our kids, and victims often don’t speak out.

 

Anyone who takes a special interest in your child, although you think that your child is the best ever, should be considered suspect. Any grown adult who is eager to spend a significant amount of time with your child should also be considered suspect. Be suspicious of those who give your kid gifts. Know that if a grown adult babysits your child, the babysitter’s children also has access to your child. If someone is married, that’s a great cover. Just because a grown man has an adult wife does not mean that he isn’t lusting after young children. Additionally, for tweens and teenagers, exemption is granted, but they, too, are capable of taking advantage of those more vulnerable.

We can’t rely on the media to go in depth about the shameful and controversial issue that is child sexual abuse. But what we can do is stop profiling those that we think may abuse our kids, while eliminating those who are actually most likely to abuse our kids – the teenagers and adults that we, or our kids, are closest to. Until then, child sex abuse statistics will continue to rise, all the while, like in the Jerry Sandusky case, most instances are never even reported to begin with.

Tags: , ,